TAX REFORM The Legislature failed, yet again, to fundamentally change how Pennsylvania pays for its schools in its fourth attempt at property tax reform in nearly 20 years. There’s slots to be angry about.
RANTER’S NOTE: Tuesday is election day in Pennsylvania. To better prepare you for pushing the electronic buttons in a new-fangled voting booth, I’ve decided to look at an issue each day that you might want to factor into your decisions.
Pennsylvania’s method of taxing property to pay the bulk of school districts costs is arguably the worst in the nation and has been getting worse for decades, according to G. Terry Madonna, director of the Center for Politics and Public Affairs at Millersville University.
“No issue quite intimidates politicians, as does the subject of tax reform. They fear it and the wrath of voters should reform be perceived as a tax increase,” Madonna wrote in an opinion piece five years ago that’s still posted on his Web site at the college.
It’s as true today as when he first wrote it.
The state is supposed to pay half of all school district costs. The 501 districts are supposed to pick up the other half with local property taxes, and to a lesser extent, various income taxes.
But as education costs have risen, the state’s share of paying them has dropped every year. It’s now down to about 36 percent, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported in January. Only Connecticut and Nebraska contribute a smaller share.
Meanwhile, Pennsylvania annually ranks among the highest states in education costs in the nation as new contracts to pay unionized teachers – which account for as much as 60 percent of a school district’s annual costs – continually push their average pay higher. The National Education Association now reports Pennsylvania’s average teacher salary to be $53,258, while the national average is $47,808.
Pennsylvania is the only state in the nation that does not either restrict its school boards ability to tax or spend, or leave it up to local voters to decide.
“The inevitable result: local property taxes have been going up steadily, and in some cases, sharply, year after year as local school districts are forced to cover more and more education costs,” Madonna wrote in 2002. “Politically, state officials are winners by ‘exporting’ the problem to local government, but policy wise education funding is a mess. It’s a classic example of good politics making bad policy.
“… Pennsylvania’s population is aging at the same time education costs are rising. The increasing share of education costs are being borne by the property tax at the exact time that aging local tax payers on fixed incomes are less able to pay.”
In Pennsylvania, county commissioners set the assessment rates on property while schools have no limit on how their tax rates, known as millage, are applied to those assessments. A mill is a tax of $1 for every $1,000 of a property’s assessed value. For example, a homeowner whose house is assessed at $100,000 and taxed at 30 mills would pay $3,000 in property taxes annually.
Despite complaints from taxpayers, many county boards have put off expensive reassessments of the property within their borders for decades – even though over time it produced unfairness in the way newer properties are taxed – in the hope that statewide reform would one day become law and shift the burden away from property taxes entirely.
In 1987, then Gov. Bob Casey tried to do just that.
Casey proposed an amendment to the state Constitution shifting the local tax base from property owners to wage earners. His bill swiftly passed in the Legislature. But the state’s Constitution requires that any change in the method of taxing residents must first be approved by voters before it can become law.
The popular governor championed the change, but even he could not prevent the referendum from being shot down in flames – by a four-to-one margin.
“Since then our state political leaders have seemed timid if not downright skittish about the issue,” Madonna wrote.
Ten years went by before lawmakers tried again.
In 1997, the Legislature passed Act 50, known as the Homestead Exemption Act. It permitted increases in the earned income tax in exchange for reductions in nuisance taxes and property taxes.
But a year later, only three districts opted to enact it, because the law required districts to get voter approval in a referendum if they wanted to raise taxes in future years.
The issue was shelved again until 2004, when the Legislature passed a bill, S.B. 292 later known as Act 71, legalizing 61,000 slot machines in 14 parlors across the state in exchange for an estimated $1 billion a year in new tax revenue.
The measure was not put to a statewide referendum. Instead, legislative leaders, who took millions of dollars in campaign contributions and lobbying gifts for years from gambling interests, hid the bill from public view.
They merely slid its 145-pages into an unrelated two-paragraph bill before they brought it to the floors of both the House and Senate for votes without any public comment late at night before adjourning for the July 4 holiday weekend.
Anti-casino groups sued, seeking to overturn it. Although the slots bill’s passage appeared to violate the normal Constitutionally-required process, the state Supreme Court upheld it.
Common Cause, a bipartisan group advocating good government, is now suing legislative leaders alleging they and Supreme Court justices have been acting in collusion in exchange for a pay raise for all judges in the state. The raise was passed last year along with pay hikes for the legislators and executive branch employees. But voter outrage forced the Legislature to repeal all of the raises four months later.
At the same time the slots bill was passed, the Legislature introduced and voted on Act 72, the Homeowner Tax Relief Act. School districts that “opted in” under the act would get a share of the state’s $1 billion from slot machines, if they enacted a 0.1 percent Earned Income Tax (EIT), which in turn would pay for local property tax relief. Each district’s share of the slots money would then be used to further reduce property taxes.
The measure promised to curtail property taxes, not eliminate them. But under it, the average property tax bill statewide would be reduced “by an average of $330″ a year, Gov. Ed Rendell predicted at the time.
However, to get the slots money, the districts also had to promise that if they needed to raise taxes more than the rate of inflation in future years, the final decision would be put to each district’s voters in a referendum.
Fearing their future taxing power would be sapped, only 111 of the 501 school districts in the state opted to take the slots money and put their future budgets potentially at the whim of voters.
Act 72 “is a mess,” Senate President Pro Tempore Robert Jubelirer, R-Altoona, told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review last year. “There’s no other way to put it.”
The trouble is, property-tax relief was the main justification for legalizing the slot machines, which are expected to begin generating revenue next year. So lawmakers tried tax reform again two weeks ago with H.B. 39.
That bill is similar to Act 72, only this time the school districts are not given any way of opting out.
Each school district would get a share of the slots largesse, but with a catch – they are required to put a referendum on the May 2007 primary ballot asking local voters if they want to switch up to 25 percent of their school district’s property tax revenue to either an earned income and net profits tax or a personal income tax.
If voters approve, the district would then be limited in how much it could raise the new income tax based on the increase in statewide wages as calculated by the state and federal labor departments.
By law, the new tax could only climb as fast as taxpayers might be able to pay it.
Famous People of Manitoba
Winnipeg Top Realtors
Winnipeg Real Estate Sell Condos Houses
www.realtytaxconsultant.com
Related Websites -
Property Taxes and the Paid-Off Mortgage If you have paid-off your mortgage (as we did earlier this year), you have some new tasks to takeover from the bank or mortgage company. One of those is paying the property taxes on your home. We just received our first tax bill. There are a few rules and procedures...... -
Dakota Roche on How to Stay Loose and Not Get Rusty in the Off Season How's it going guys? My name is Dakota Roche. Iâm writing today on Snowboarding Skier to share an observation of mine for everyone to consider. Keep reading; it can definitely help! The main sport that I'm into is BMX. I've been pro for 3 years and have been riding for...... -
Relief for home short sales A short sale of one's home is different than we use the term 'short sale' when referring to stocks. When you sell a stock short, you sell a stock you do not own, and hope it goes down so you buy it back at a lower cost. A short sale...... -
Taxing Financial Transactions: Good Idea or Not? After nearly a year of rising stock prices, with falling unemployment (albeit rather slowly) and higher than expected economic growth, there's been a decided change in the commentary from many in the media. The pitchforks and torches have been put away, and being an investment banker is no longer something...... -
Tax Loss Harvesting Advice... From My Accountant According to my friends, I'm one of those people who has "a guy" for everything. I have a guy who does my car maintenance, a guy who helps me maintain this blog, and occasionally a handyman who gets a call on Sunday evening because I'm a wannabe Home Depot weekend......
What is Debt Leverage? Leverage is a term that is often used synonymously with debt, and for this reason, it is important that people come to understand what debt leveraging actually means, and how it works in an ordinary financial transaction, such as buying a home for example. Let us suppose that you are...... 
The Feedback Loop of Real Estate, Poverty, Crime, Education & Taxes Excellent illustration displaying the interwoven connection, or feedback loop, of real estate to poverty rates, crime, education, property taxes and home values by Jessica Hagy of Indexed.com. I'm a major believer in the idea that visual illustrations, and even on-demand web based video, can be significantly more powerful than text...... 
Advantages Disadvantages of Condominium Real Estate Purchases in 2009
It has been said that “Now is the best time for a condo /Condominimum” . Is that so you may well ask ? Here is such an expert “commentary”:
Think about a condo:
There’s a surplus of inventory in the condominium market, so your realtor should be able to negotiate a good deal for you when it comes to buying a condo, Linda says. If you’re buying as an investor, rather than a first-time homebuyer, you will want to consider leasing out your suite for the next four to five years before selling, she explains. “It’s been suggested that the condo markeBuy and sell your house successfully with 10 tips from a real estate professional.
There are more than a number of factors as to why there is a surplus of this product:
First of all – a house is a house is a house. A lot of investors got snapped up in all the whirlwind about the baby boomers retiring. Its all about lifestyle etc etc etc. Who needs the work of a house ? Boomers are going to sell their houses and enter the condo market . So the logic went.
Again a house has its benefits. On top of that many people do enjoy the yard work and assorted responsibilties of a house after all. On top of that the management “service” that is so tightly controlled for costs – in many ways becomes its own business. Its like the civil service – the larger the budget , the more justifiable is the whole effort. On top of that the management service can not only justifty itself but takes its charges one way or another in relation to the total budget of the operation. On top of that if the condo management service was rewarded for efficiencies and costs savings – then the owners might well ( or will balk) at the charges and costs in relation to costs.
Foreclosed Condos in Florida – Florida is one of the worst affected by foreclosures. Foreclosed condos in Florida are of special headache to the borrower, lender, condo association and the community.
Empty condos not the problem downtown — it’s lack of room for families – That has been seen as the smoking gun to prove the truth of Vancouver’s most famous story about itself — that all of our downtown condos are dark at night because there’s no one living there. They’re all owned by offshore investors just …
First tenants of Aspen Lofts condos in Boise tout the spacious … – People are moving into the 17-story, 32-foot-wide building at 851 W. Front St. — official name, Aspen Lofts — and doubts about the feasibility of the site have dwindled like an aggressive stock-market portfolio. Inside the Aspen Lofts …
Las Vegas Condos | HaveInfo.com – The other recent tendency, however, that sweeps the city’s real estate market has been condo building which has occurred as a real boom. A lot of famed developers are focusing now on Las Vegas condos market. For example, casinos like …
Henderson Condos For Sale | Henderson Homes For Sale – Don’t Buy a Condo in Henderson or Las Vegas before you read this. There are amazing Henderson Condos For Sale.
Next there may well be a lot of condos on the market. Many of the above investors who planned prudently on cashing in on the trend – are in a situation thanks to the economic downtown and stock market meltdown of having to liquidate assets. You may well be in the driver’s seat if you are buying a condo for your own use.
However this current economic situation may not be the best for your real estate purchases as well. Its a two edged sword. You may well find that the tenants adjoining you who are you neighbors – and that you carefully evaluated – may well vacate as welll and be replaced by the new owners by not the same calibre of property owners.
Condo purchasers – tread lightly and gently in 2009.
Glendale Winnipeg
Buy Dimebon Online Pharmacy
South Winnipeg Super 8 Budget Hotel
Winnipeg Web Graphic Designer Development Winnipeg “Sales Oxygen”
Winnipeg Property Tax Assessment
www.realtytaxconsultant.com